Friday, February 5, 2010

BEST OF THE DECADE - #6: A History of Violence

A History of Violence (2006): Dir. David Cronenberg. Written by Josh Olson, based on the graphic novel by John Wagner and Vince Locke. Starring: Viggo Mortensen, Maria Bello, Ed Harris, William Hurt. Rated R (strong brutal violence, graphic sexuality, nudity, language and some drug use). Running time: 95 min.

**NOTE: This review freely discusses elements of the film’s plot, and if you have not yet seen the film or are unfamiliar with the plot, I would recommend watching it first.

The crime genre has been around since The Great Train Robbery captivated audiences in 1903. There is something thrilling about watching a life of crime unfold onscreen, almost as if we’re hardwired as humans to be entertained by such exploits. More than one hundred years after that first cinematic heist, the crime genre still dominates film and audiences continue to be entertained by the violent acts of robbers, drug dealers and gangsters. David Cronenberg’s A History of Violence, adapted by Josh Olson from the graphic novel of the same name, is a compulsively entertaining film that capitalizes on this ingrained fascination with crime while also exploring the moral and psychological implications of violence. The film invites us to enjoy the action onscreen, but then questions that very instinctual pleasure.

A History of Violence is genre film populated by larger-than-life gangsters and quaint Midwesterners. A seemingly innocent family man, Tom Stall (Viggo Mortensen), runs a diner in Millbrook, Indiana with his loving wife, Edie (Maria Bello). They have a son in high school and a daughter still young enough to be afraid of monsters under the bed. They know the sheriff on a first name basis and do nothing to invite trouble into Millbrook. This changes when a pair of professional killers passes through town, tries to rob the diner and murder everyone in it. Tom suddenly takes action by killing the two men with unusual efficiency for a small town man. Tom becomes a local hero and the media attention attracts a few “bad men” from out of town, most notably the menacing Carl Fogarty (Ed Harris), who recognizes Tom as an unfavorable acquaintance from years ago named Joey. The film is economically edited to a lean 95 minutes, yet David Cronenberg evokes more authentic emotion in those 95 minutes than most directors could in three hours. Every scene does its share of work, from subtleties at the breakfast table that establish the Stall family dynamics, to an earnest sex scene that shows Tom and Edie are still very much in love after years of marriage. Once the action starts, the film rockets along with a series of increasingly tense and revealing scenes.

Though the film functions as prime entertainment, it is also deeply layered with ideas regarding the nature of human violence. We see the teenaged Jack Stall possibly filling his father’s old shoes as he stands up to a bully in what turns out to be a more brutal fight that the typical hallway scuffle. Issues of identity make up the film’s main drama – are Tom and Joey really different identities, or two halves living within the same man? After Edie witnesses this other side of her husband come out, she confronts him in the hospital. Has their marriage been an act? Where is the line between lies and true emotion? Without ever betraying the moments that precede it, this scene pushes the film beyond the expectations we hold for a conventional crime drama.

A History of Violence is like a sequel we would never expect to see to a gangster film. Colorful characters like Ed Harris’s Carl Fogarty, or William Hurt as Joey’s brother are compelling enough to steal an entire film, but only make appearances here. William Hurt even received an Oscar nomination for his brief but charismatic 20 minutes of screen time. It’s as if the world of gangster films has seeped into the real world, and it’s from this interaction that A History of Violence creates its drama. Joey comes out of Tom in one violent moment, and that momentary transformation allows the past to commingle with the present.

David Cronenberg, who made a name for himself as an auteur of the bizarre with a string of cult-classic sci-fi and horror films, proves himself to be a masterful director here. Watch, for example, the final scene, when Viggo Mortensen comes home after a final visit with his brother and finds his family eating a meatloaf dinner in silence. As he stands outside his home, we see Joey and Tom at once in his face, and he wonders how the two identities can be reconciled. Without speaking a word, Edie looks up as he enters the room and Maria Bello’s expressive face asks him who he is, Tom or Joey? By cutting between close-ups of the two actors, a speechless conversation unfolds between them. Accompanied by Howard Shore’s musical score, this quiet moment of domesticity turns into the height of drama. The scene cuts to black and the film ends on a moment of uncertainty, but not ambiguity. The film has very clearly introduced big questions that do not have easy answers, if they have them at all. Cronenberg crafts a hugely entertaining film, but delves deeper than most filmmakers would by exploring the consequences of the characters’ violence. By reeling us in early and then turning the film on its head, he leaves us as devastated as the Stall family sitting at the dinner table.

- Steve Avigliano, 2/5/10

4 comments:

  1. Really surprised at this pick. I thought this movie was "okay" at best. The last third where he just goes around shooting everyone was terrible and ruined the movie for me. A film like this with such high emotions - I would have preferred they just have him leave then come back, but still have that moment with the wife, leaving us with even more uncertainty. Did he talk it out with the gangsters or kill all of them? Maybe have him walk to his room and we see a bloodstain in his footprint and she cleans it off, crying.

    Really good sex scene though. And I don't mean that as a creeper - lot of raw emotion and passion there.

    Still... ugh. Six? Really? Eastern Promises is a much better movie with Viggo.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rudy,

    If you cut those scenes from the film, you lose an important part of one of the film's main themes: family. The film explores violence as being a natural or even genetic part of you (Tom's son brutally beats a kid in the hallway after his father's attack), so it is important to see Tom confront his brother, a mobster from Philly. Also, the scenes with his brother provide insight into Tom's life as Joey, as well as shows us his relationship with his brother.

    As for the violence, I think Cronenberg does an excellent job of giving us only flashes of violence. Since the film explores issues of violence, it is important to see some of that violence onscreen. Cronenberg gets us to enjoy the action sequences (and the violence that comes with them) before pulling the rug out from underneath us and revealing the darkness of the action.

    Interesting that you mention Eastern Promises, another Cronenberg film. Viggo is fantastic in that film as well, but for me, that film didn't come together as a whole as well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You should really read the book - in my opinion, it vastly surpasses the movie. Also, if you leave "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" off this list, you are a criminal. Think about "Adam's Apples" (an obscure danish film you haven't seen), "the Station Agent" and "Let the Right One In" too.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fun Fact: The Station Agent was filmed in my hometown of Rockaway. Great film. I haven't seen the other films (although they're all foreign so they wouldn't be on this list anyways), but I intend to check them out asap on Netflix.

    ReplyDelete