3 stars (out of four)
In Prometheus, scientists land on a breathtaking world many millions of miles from Earth and, as is often the case, some pretty horrible things are waiting for them there.
A kind-of-sort-of prequel to the Alien films, Prometheus reveals its relation to those movies only loosely at
first, mostly by borrowing their imagery and visual style, and builds a new
mythology meant to coexist with the already established franchise. Knowledge of
how all these parts from various films fit together is inessential to enjoying
this one though and, at any rate, the mythology may or may not be too
important. This is a straightforward sci-fi thriller wrapped in lofty ideas and
a complex plot but its pleasures are relatively simple.
Onscreen text informs us the year is 2093 and that a crew of
seventeen is onboard the spaceship Prometheus heading toward an undisclosed
location. If you’ve seen movies like this before, not the least of which being
the Alien films, you will recognize that
seventeen is a large number of characters and that something bad will surely
happen to at least a few (and quite probably many more) of them before the
movie is over. Your intuitive suspicions will be reinforced when you learn that
only a handful of these characters get substantial scenes and more than one of
the supporting players are outright jerks. I trust you see where this is going.
Among the main characters are Elizabeth (Noomi Rapace) and
Charlie (Logan Marshall-Green), archaeologists who discover a pattern in
several otherwise unrelated cave paintings across the Earth. The pattern points
to a distant galaxy where, they believe, they will find the intelligent beings
that created humans some millennia ago. An aged billionaire (Guy Pearce
underneath a lot of makeup) agrees to fund a mission that will send them and a
crew of technicians and scientists to that galaxy (specifically one moon in
that galaxy) to see if they can make contact. Leading them is an icy corporate
overseer, Meredith (Charlize Theron).
Also onboard is David (Michael Fassbender), an artificial
intelligence robot. While the crew slept in a cryogenic stasis for two years en
route to their destination, David was awake, studying human culture (old
movies, mostly) and learning ancient languages so that he may hopefully
translate an alien-human conversation should there be one.
Noomi Rapace, the original girl with the dragon tattoo, is
an intensely focused and amazingly resourceful heroine and Charlize Theron’s
cold, calculating performance is a welcome reprieve from all the shouting she
did in Snow White (I swear I could hear
her in the theater next door). Logan Marshall-Green is a likable actor, though
I don’t buy the character’s flippancy in the face of such monumental
discoveries (or maybe Mr. Marshall-Green is just too ruggedly handsome to
convincingly play a scientist). As the ship’s gruff captain, Idris Elba is a
delightfully charismatic presence. It says something about a person when, after
being cryogenically frozen for two years, the first thing he does is smoke a
cigarette.
Michael Fassbender, however, steals the show. His tone of
voice and facial tics always seem on the verge of showing emotions aside from
the polite conviviality David has been programmed to convey. In a subtle way
then, Mr. Fassbender’s performance gives depth to ideas the script only dances
around regarding the extent of David’s humanity. We watch his reactions
closely: Was that menace in his voice, or just the unsympathetic reasoning of a
computer?
The script, written by Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof,
introduces a lot of enticing mysteries, including David, who seems to know
something the other don’t. There is also the far grander question which
Elizabeth and Charlie intend to ask when they meet their makers-in-question: If
aliens created humans, for what purpose did they do it? And why leave clues in
the cave paintings? The film gets a lot of mileage out of dangling these
mysteries in front of us, though I am not sure they all get resolved in
satisfying ways. Prometheus cares about
its existential intrigue only so far and then it cares about the more obvious
joy of watching humans get murdered by creepy-crawlies.
The score by Marc Streitenfeld creates a majestic mood as
the scientists explore the alien moon and its runes, rightly characterizing their
discoveries as the greatest in mankind’s history. But the characters don’t
always see it this way. They’re too busy endangering their lives in all sorts
of reckless ways. In their version of Earth circa 2093 are there no horror
movies to teach them that they should never reach out and touch, much less
taunt, an unidentified tentacle?
Prometheus is not
without its sophistications, however. It is marvelous to look out and boasts
one of the best production designs in a movie in perhaps years. Director Ridley
Scott, who also made the first Alien,
adds splashes of color to his earlier film’s rusty palette; consoles in the
ship’s sleek interior light up yellow and purple.
There is also a wonderful attention to detail. Hours after waking
from their two-year slumber the crew dons their spacesuits for the first time
and their movements are understandably clumsy. When they try to cram into a
small rover, their large helmets bump up against each other. Not many movies
include moments like that.
Prometheus is tense
and exciting enough that you do not mind that it neglects to answer every
question it raises (or even most of them), at least not until you are well on
your way out of the theater and discussing it. The elaborate backstory ends up
being a little beside the point and I wonder why it was included if it was to
be left undeveloped. There will probably be a second film that addresses the
unsolved mysteries but am I the only one who wishes movies would just stand on
their own without always setting themselves up for a sequel?
- Steve Avigliano, 6/11/12
This movie was absolutely atrocious. The actions of the characters continually made no sense (especially David poisoning Asshole McScientist), the make up on Guy Pearce was terrible beyond belief, and Noomi Rapace was TERRIBLE as the lead - her British accent slipped time and time again. I didn't give a shit about any of the characters because they WEREN'T characters, just lame stereotypes. The only attempt at character development was Shaw suddenly saying "I can't have children" and crying, something that CAME OUT OF NOWHERE and seemed completely tacked on.
ReplyDeleteIt's clear Lindelof brought a lot of his Lost mentality over, because he leaves the audience with a bunch of unanswered questions WHICH YOU CAN'T FUCKING DO IN A SELF-CONTAINED MOVIE.
Between this review and your purposefully contrarian one of the Avengers, I really have no respect for your point-of-view anymore.
And if you couldn't recognize that the "old movie" that David likes to watch was Lawrence of Arabia, I'm pretty sure your movie critic card needs to be taken away.
Dear Anonymous,
DeleteI'm glad to see you found your 'caps lock' key. Your criticisms of "Prometheus" are fair though I cannot say the film's weaknesses bothered me as much as they did you.
I resent your assumption that I wrote a negative review of "The Avengers" to be deliberately contrarian. The only opinion I can ever offer is an honest one and the day I walk into a movie theater to write a negative review simply for the sake of going against the grain, then that day, sir or madam, is the day I turn in my movie critic card.
- Steve
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKXwj7ZrHIc
DeleteSteve,
ReplyDeleteI found your opinions quite on-the-mark, and very detailed. I completely agree with your skepticism of scientists who would want to reach out and touch a recently discovered organism. What the hell? The guy was a freaking BIOLOGIST, and the first thing he does with a potentially dangerous creature is reach out to touch it? And I'm glad you picked up on Fassbender's work here--I thought he was the strongest part of the film.
And nice work with your civil reply to "Anonymous." Someone ought to remind Mr./Miss/Mrs. Anonymous that your reviews are subjective. Multiple viewpoints are possible, but not necessarily exclusionary. If Anonymous is attempting to troll, might I suggest Anonymous look up the definition of "wit."
On the subject of scientists not acting like scientists (SPOILER) I got a kick out of how they reacted to the disembodied head. "Let's pump it full of stuff until it explodes!" What? And no one was even taking notes? Obviously I suspend my disbelief with movie scientists but their "science" was getting flat-out goofy at points haha.
Delete