Showing posts with label Peter Sarsgaard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Sarsgaard. Show all posts

Thursday, August 22, 2013

REVIEW: Blue Jasmine

Blue Jasmine (2013): Written and directed by: Woody Allen. Starring: Alec Baldwin, Cate Blanchett, Louis C.K., Bobby Cannavale, Andrew Dice Clay, Sally Hawkins, Peter Sarsgaard and Michael Stuhlbarg. Rated PG-13 (Booze is drank and things are said). Running time: 98 minutes.

4 stars (out of four)

When we first see Jasmine (Cate Blanchett), she seems well put together. Elegant, riding in first class, lounging in her chair like she’s just bought the world on credit, she dishes the details of her divorce to the elderly woman seated beside her. Gabbing all the way to baggage claim, you might call her overly chatty or brazenly forthcoming with personal details, but she certainly presents herself as a picture of poise.

Blue Jasmine, the new film written and directed by Woody Allen, depicts the steady unraveling of this woman’s persona. Bubbling just underneath her designer clothes and meticulously maintained golden blonde hair is a twitchy, desperate woman who, we learn, has just suffered a nervous breakdown and appears to be on the verge of another.

Allen often writes neurotic characters into his scripts, usually as a stand-in for his own anxious persona, but Jasmine is a far more complex character than the typical dyspeptic types found in so many of Allen’s comedies. Her problems run much deeper than phobias and a surly worldview; her life of luxury has been violently ripped out from underneath her, a fact she attempts to avoid with corrosive self-deception.

Through conversations and flashbacks, we learn that Jasmine’s husband Hal (Alec Baldwin), a hugely successful entrepreneur, has been convicted of fraud. His empire, including Jasmine’s cushy Park Avenue lifestyle, turns out to have been built on lies and deceit, and has subsequently been snatched away by the U.S. government.

Now broke and hopelessly lost, Jasmine turns to her couldn’t-be-more-different sister, Ginger (a charmingly dizzy Sally Hawkins), who graciously takes Jasmine in despite their past. (Ginger and her ex-husband Augie (Andrew Dice Clay, somehow both gruff and cuddly) were collateral damage in one of Hal’s schemes.) Jasmine will live with Ginger and her two young boys in their modest San Francisco apartment, at least until she gets her feet back on the ground.

The film’s tone ducks and weaves with Blanchett’s performance. One moment, Blue Jasmine is a social comedy, the next it’s an unnerving portrait of mental illness. The comedy comes largely from Ginger, her new mechanic boyfriend Chili (Bobby Cannavale with a hilariously long strand of hair slicked behind his ear), and a spare handful of the people who enter and exit their lives. (Louis C.K. has a nice supporting turn as a competing love interest of Ginger’s.)

These characters are a rowdy and deeply flawed bunch, and from Jasmine’s condescending, undeservedly privileged vantage point, they seem painfully uncultured. On a lunch date with Ginger, Chili and his dopey pal Eddie (Max Casella, getting the biggest laughs of the movie), she doesn’t just order a vodka. She orders a Stoli with a twist of lemon.

But these people are also full of life. Compare them to Jasmine, who walks around in a fog of misery, bumping into men both good and bad (Peter Sarsgaard as a widowed and heartbroken man with great ambitions, and Michael Stuhlbarg as an unsavory dentist).

All the while, Jasmine’s past follows her around like a malignant shadow. The story of Hal’s crimes is more than just fabulously juicy gossip; it is part of her identity. It’s how she gets introduced at parties. She can’t escape it.

Woody Allen has juggled the comedic and the tragic before, but rarely with such a deft touch. He has an ear for idle conversation and his social dialogue is as on point as ever. But he also shows an unprecedented boldness by presenting Jasmine as a very real, very complicated individual. The script hits some decidedly minor notes. Sometimes these moments are offset with comedic relief. Sometimes the laughs come from a less comfortable place.

Allen is a terrifically prolific filmmaker (he’s stayed on pace at a movie a year for more than four decades), though not a very consistent one (his films fall all over the map in terms of quality). Blue Jasmine ranks in the highest tier of his work and is perhaps his best film since 2005’s simmering noir thriller Match Point. It’s a smart, compassionate and funny film, anchored by Cate Blanchett’s remarkable performance. Jasmine is wretched but also vulnerable, bitter but sadly disillusioned. There is much that is buried deep inside her and Woody Allen proves a fearless excavator.

- Steve Avigliano, 8/22/13

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

REVIEW: Green Lantern

Green Lantern (2011): Dir. Martin Campbell. Screenplay by: Greg Berlanti, Michael Green, Marc Guggenheim and Michael Goldenberg. Story by: Greg Berlanti, Michael Green and Marc Guggenheim. Based on the comics by: John Broome and Gil Kane. Starring: Ryan Reynolds, Blake Lively, Peter Sarsgaard and Mark Strong. Rated PG-13 (intense sequences of sci-fi violence and action). Running time: 114 minutes.

1 star (out of four)

Hal Jordan (Ryan Reynolds) has the power to create anything he wants to fight his enemies with. Let that sink in for a moment. Anything. When called upon to use this power, he creates a chainsaw, a machine gun, a really big fist. If you were given the ability to create anything at all out of nothing, wouldn’t you feel obligated to be a little more creative than that?

Green Lantern is an uninspired bore; its script seems to have been written by someone who saw Spider-Man once and was asked to copy the structure of its superhero origin story from memory. Hal Jordan, a cocky Air Force pilot, is the unlikely recipient of a green ring that bears with it great responsibility. Jordan has been chosen by the ring’s magical powers to become a Green Lantern – a Guardian of the Universe – and we all know that you can’t argue with a magic ring’s decision.

In many recent superhero movies, there has been a touch of much-needed self-awareness. Audiences cannot be expected to sit through film after film of increasingly silly heroes without those films acknowledging that maybe these stories are a little silly. There are moments when Green Lantern tries this but more often these scenes come across as lazy writing. When Jordan is given the ring by an alien who crash-lands on Earth, he immediately calls his friend to the crash site and the following exchange occurs:

“Is that a spaceship?”
“Yeah.”
“Is it real?”
“Yeah.”

There is no sense of wonder or excitement in Green Lantern, just the obligatory motions of a story that is being told… Why? To ensure that the ever-profitable mines of superhero lore have been thoroughly exhausted?

After receiving the ring, Jordan travels to the planet Oa where he meets the thousands of other Lanterns whose appearances range from fishy humanoids to burly trolls. Their leader, Sinestro (Mark Strong) looks almost completely human except that he has reddish purple skin, pointy ears and even pointier eyebrows. The Lanterns are currently plagued by the evil Parallax, a former Guardian of the Universe turned giant cloudy beast. He seeks to destroy Oa using the yellow power of Fear (as opposed to the green power of Will) but for reasons I have forgotten, must first devour Earth. This is where Jordan comes in.

There is another villain back on Earth named Dr. Hector Hammond (Peter Sarsgaard wearing a spectacular receding hairline and moustache), a science professor who is given the opportunity to study the body of the alien who crashed on Earth. Unbeknownst to him (but knownst to us), he is exposed to a trace of Parallax’s yellow DNA and its evil powers soon overcome him.

Dr. Hammond is a sorry excuse for a villain. The DNA of Parallax allows him unspeakable powers but he wastes them in a pathetic fit of jealousy over Jordan’s love interest, the improbably beautiful Air Force pilot Carol Ferris (Blake Lively). Dr. Hammond is so absorbed by his crush on Ferris that he is oblivious to Parallax’s plan for world devouring. Neither he nor Jordan have much of an understanding of what is going on and neither can think of anything better to do with their cool, new powers but use them against one another in a handful of dull, insipid fight scenes.

With the exception of the ghastly Parallax, the special effects in Green Lantern have a cartoonish silliness that might have been better suited to a children’s film. Come to think of it, Green Lantern on a whole might have been better off as a kids’ movie. The story’s simplicity might have been charming in a low-stakes PG outing but when blown-up to blockbuster proportions, one can only think about how little one cares about any of the characters onscreen.

I cannot say whether Green Lantern stays true to its comic book origins or not. I have had virtually no contact with the character or the world he is a part of prior to this movie. I do know, however, that the filmmakers behind Green Lantern could have made anything. Anything at all. And this is what they chose.

- Steven Avigliano, 6/29/11